As the numerous responses to my first post show, this is one of the most common and controversial questions asked about DMOZ.
To answer this question, it is important to consider what DMOZ isn't.
DMOZ is not set up as a listing service for site owners. Site submissions are only one source for finding quality sites to add to the directory. Some editors choose to review submissions while other editors might prefer to (at first) find sites on their own through search engines, as links from related sites, in newspapers, on television, on highway billboards, etc. So...there are no guarantees that once you submit your site it will be reviewed within a specific amount of time.
There are also a number of practical reasons it can take a while for a site to get listed in DMOZ:
The site is submitted to an incorrect category. Many sites are submitted to categories that are either too broad, too narrow, or unrelated to the content of the site being submitted. Most of the time, incorrectly submitted sites are sent to the appropriate category for review, but that will usually increase the amount of time that a site will ultimately wait for review. Submitting your site to the single most specific category relative to your site's content will significantly improve your chances of getting your site reviewed.
The site is submitted to the wrong language section of the directory. For example, non-English sites are frequently submitted to the English-language section of the directory. As with sites submitted to the wrong category, editors have to redirect these sites to the correct language, which can increase the amount of time that they will await review.
The submitted site does not meet submission or editorial guidelines for inclusion. Quite often people submit sites that are incomplete, don't contain enough content, or consist primarily of syndicated or mirrored content. Uniqueness of content is one of the most important factors editors consider when reviewing a site for inclusion.
The category has a backlog of submissions. This can result when the popularity of the topic, which may attract large numbers of both listable and unlistable sites, doesn't match the interests of active or prospective editors. Submitting to one of these categories may mean a longer wait. (That doesn't mean you should submit your site to the wrong category just because you think it doesn't have a backlog – deliberately submitting your site to the wrong category is never a good choice.)
URBAN LEGENDS ( i.e. popular & fictional reasons ) as to why a site does not gain acceptance into
The category editor is corrupt and/or a competitor is keeping the site from being listed. DMOZ regularly receives allegations of corruption and abuse through its public abuse reporting system. Each report is thoroughly investigated and crosschecked. Most of these claims turn out to be baseless. In the rare case where there may be some truth to the allegation, the matter is dealt with immediately.
No one is monitoring the category. While a few categories in DMOZ may not have a listed editor that doesn't mean there's no one minding the store. All editors listed higher in a category's hierarchy can and do edit subcategories. In addition, many editors have permissions to edit anywhere in the directory.
I'm certain there will be no shortage of comments to this post, but please consider the topics listed above and re-check your submission application again.
And if/when you do submit, please...please....please avoid any claims/jokes/sarcasm of offering money to get accepted into DMOZ. Editors apply zero sense of humor to these types of statements and it is a sure fire way to ensure your site does not gain entry. Ever.
One of my future posts will include best practice recommendations for suggesting sites to editors.
Cheers.
Bob Keating
Managing Editor, DMOZ Staff


Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.



1. I have submitted my company and url since January of 2007 on a monthly basis and it has never been listed. I also offered to be an editor and completed the applicaton 4 - 5 months ago and no follow-up. Company - Quest Continuing Educaiton Solutions - http://www.questce.com
I appreciate comments.
Alan L. Krenke
Quest Continuing Education Solutions
Posted at 7:04PM on Jan 23rd 2008 by Alan Krenke
2. For issues with the CAPTCHA when making site suggestions, please see: http://www.resource-zone.com/forum/showthread.php?t=49508
For anyone who thinks repeatedly suggesting the same site is a good idea, please don't -- it only creates more work for editors, which in turn will delay the review of your, and everyone else's, site suggestions.
In particular, the guidelines at http://www.dmoz.org/add.html (that you agree that you've read each time you suggest a site) state: "Please only submit a URL to the Open Directory once. Again, multiple submissions of the same or related sites may result in the exclusion and/or deletion of those and all affiliated sites."
Posted at 6:10AM on Jan 24th 2008 by chaos127
3. Hi, I submitted my site: http://www.myweddingaccents.com awhile ago and I'm not sure if it went through or not. Is there an email confirmation sent out, because I didn't receive anything and I wanted to verify this first before I try to resend the info. I don't want to send it twice and cause delays.
Thanks kindly,
Kelly
Posted at 4:21PM on Jan 31st 2008 by support
4. what is the reason that dmoz is not submitting the sites to their directories .my site http://www.mytailorstore.com trying from almost 8 months now but no response
Posted at 2:22AM on Feb 1st 2008 by vicky
5. I submited my site about two months ago to a category that has no editor(medical) and the site above it also has no editor (uniforms). The top category (clothing) is huge. Does this mean that I my site will not be reviewed? it is frustrating to not know?
Thanks
Scott
Posted at 3:42AM on Feb 3rd 2008 by Scott Rickey
6. Sorry I should have included my site www.acumedsupplies.com
Scott
Posted at 11:57AM on Feb 3rd 2008 by Scott Rickey
7. I have to agree with several of the entries stating it would be quite helpful for website owners to be able to check the status of thier submition. Even if the the reality of the matter is our site is still just sitting there waiting to be looked at (status message site in que waiting for review). At least then we would know you have it. Is there anything someone can do to at least make sure their submition has gone through?
Posted at 7:55PM on Feb 5th 2008 by noblepro
8. I wonder if DMOZ has considered accepting "review fees." I'm just brainstorming here, but I would accept the idea of a fee --say $50 to $100 -- just to be guaranteed that the site would be reviewed within, let's say, 7 days. There would be no other strings attached, and the money would go to DMOZ, not the reviewer directly, to avoid any conflict of interest.
I'm involved with two websites, one as the VP of Marketing for a major online university, and the other a family affair. I've read some very negative comments about DMOZ and they all seem like they could be diminished if DMOZ had more money available through user fees.
Your thoughts?
Pat Partridge
http://www.wgu.edu
http://www.weightloss-wellness.com
Posted at 11:30PM on Feb 20th 2008 by pat partridge
9. Bob Keating admitted that DMOZ is biased.
Bob Keating said:
"And if/when you do submit, please...please....please avoid any claims/jokes/sarcasm of offering money to get accepted into DMOZ. Editors apply zero sense of humor to these types of statements and it is a sure fire way to ensure your site does not gain entry. Ever."
An "open" directory with an "unbiased" editor would not permit his/her evaluation of a web site to be colored by their opinion of the one person suggesting the url. After all, the obligation of the editors is to the internet community at large, not to exact revenge on someone based on an improper comment. To deny entry to an otherwise valuable resource because the editor did not like someone's comment is not in the spirit of openness and demonstrates a definite bias.
Posted at 1:48PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Paul Needles
10.
I've tried to submit my site but after submitting I don't get
acknowledgment that it was received- instead I get a page that says
make sure I have entered the security code correctly. Is this is
error? Does this mean my site was not submitted? I used the back
button (as it asks you to do) and entered the security code exactly
as it appeared. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Posted at 9:56AM on Feb 21st 2008 by Emanuela
11. thanks....
Posted at 9:48AM on Feb 24th 2008 by Spor
12. I have to agree that submitting a site, waiting for months, then be told you MIGHT BE spamming the directory by resubmitting your site is very unfair. There should be at least a status response and an allowance for continued submissions without penalty if a certain time limit between submissions is observed.
I've been trying to get into the DMOZ for four years, submitting every 3 to 6 months. I seriously wonder if anyone is at home?
Posted at 12:38PM on Feb 24th 2008 by info
13. I finally figured out how to get my site listed on DMOZ - http://www.thebutcherblocktop.com- It would seem that this is the only way it will ever be listed in the Directory. lol
Posted at 5:16AM on Feb 24th 2008 by The Butcher Block Top
14. the verification image is of poor quality
Posted at 9:18AM on Feb 26th 2008 by sanjiv swarup
15. Well speaking of facts this is the best ODP i ve ever seen but as a matter of fact when any one submits his/her recommended sites from the SUGGEST URL link provided there is no further notification about whether the site has been listed or not and moreover there are no reasons given why the site/URL provided was not listed. Maybe DMOZ should work on this to hit this out!!
Posted at 9:50AM on Feb 28th 2008 by kalivd
16. I too am at a loss, I have tried to add my site http://www.dees-fancydress.co.uk to DMOZ. The lack of feeback as to if it is in a queue or not is very frustrating. Looking at the last edited date on the category shows it hasnt been updated at all in the past few months, so was by site not excepted or is no one editing the catagory.
Posted at 8:04AM on Mar 4th 2008 by deesfancydress
17. When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password. http://darkmist.tut.su
Posted at 8:48AM on Mar 5th 2008 by darkmist.tut.su
18. I submitted two sites (http://www.educationstationteachers.com and http://www.xanga.com/dextr) about a year ago. Since I had just recently learned the term "SEO" from my daughter's boyfriend over dinner, it is entirely possible that I did it wrong. However, the instructions clearly tell us not to submit again. There doesn't seem to be any way to check on whether a site is awaiting review or hasn't been properly submitted. I'm adding my comment to those above who are mentioning how helpful it would be to be able to see whether we are still in the queue or not.
Posted at 1:15PM on Mar 5th 2008 by Rebecca Haden
19. dedproductwrites.blogspot.com
Posted at 12:01PM on Mar 6th 2008 by DEVIN DAVIDSON
20. i suggested my site one year ago but why still with no replies?
http://chinaimportexport.wikispaces.com/
Posted at 4:08AM on Mar 9th 2008 by Wongdong