Back in our initial post, we mentioned that this site would serve as a forum for editors to share their stories. Why they joined. What they get out of the experience and why it matters to them.
Below is the first of many posts from our editors talking about why they joined the community.
Everyone say "hi" to ODP Editor Laigh : )
***************************************************************
The background to me applying was simple. I have written a few websites over the last two or three years and of course during this time I had come across the
I would like to point out at this time that NONE of my websites are listed in DMOZ and I declared
I first applied to join the
I received a rejection e-mail within about two days but this time I had a comment on it. It basically said that I had not filled in a certain part of the form correctly. I had a look and could have kicked myself. The form said in black and white what I needed to do but I hadn't done it right.
I had read the form religiously several times but this showed me that I had been looking at the form but not really reading it. I applied again with the parts fixed and within two days I received my joining e-mail to my complete surprise.
I immediately signed in and it was then that light began to dawn on me about the enormity of the actual community and the work that they do. It also dawned on me very quickly the reasons that you can only apply for a small category. There is so much to learn on how the system works and how to get started. I actually read for two days before I started to actually edit anything.
I quickly became enthralled with the community and now after two months or so have completed about 3000 edits. I really enjoy being part of this community and hope to be part of it for a long while.
To those reading this that are thinking of or have applied, there is a HUGE amount of help to be had. I have had nothing but encouragement from many folk in the
All that is left for me to say is that if you are thinking of applying to be an editor, please do. It is a great experience, definitely worthwhile and brings a great deal of personal satisfaction.




21. Appreciate the comment.
It is not "against the rules" for editors to be SEOs.
Just like it is not against the rules for them to be Web designers, Doctors, Lawyers, Members of Parliament or professional football players.
On the surface, your assumptions are that this professional would have the ability to insert his/her clients into any portion of the directory and get paid for it.
Simply not the case.
Just b/c someone is in a certain profession does not mean they are heartless money grabbers void of moral fiber and in capable of respecting the rules of the community.
As I'm sure you're aware, in the editor enrollment process prospects are asked to list all of the sites that they are affiliated with, those are the sites that you see on this editors profile.
It is not a shameless promotion, but notification.
At some point, after the consistency of the message coming out of our group is understood, DMOZ is a volunteer group who participate for the passion of giving something to the web community.
Also, corruption in no way, shape or form is tolerated. If you find an example, post it on this blog. I assure it will be taken care of quickly ( if vaild - not a hoax - like Shoemoney.com ).
Thanks for stopping by.
BBQGrant
Posted at 9:29AM on Dec 3rd 2007 by bbqgrant
22. this is not the first time i am seeing banjo posting anti dmoz comments. if only half of that much commitment went into reading guidelines, there might have had been 1000 more sites listed in the ODP .
Posted at 1:58AM on Dec 4th 2007 by arindra
23. Great SITE for Submission... We want our URL to be promoted by Dmoz definately...
Posted at 7:50AM on Dec 5th 2007 by S. Neeraj Dhar
24. @ Amir
This blog post was made by me to reflect my genuine feelings as a new editor in ODP. I, by no means, speak for ODP but speak for myself and my own experiences.
I do note on your post that you say:
"I'm sure most editors are honest and truly do it to make the web a better place. But that doesn't mean a few bad apples can't ruin it for us all"
You are quite correct. MOST editors ARE honest and we do hopefully make the web a better place. You are also quite correct when you refer to the bad apples. If you see any you have had a direct invitation from the ODP staff to report it using the official channels and a genuine assurance that any reports will be investigated swiftly and derisively. If you do this you yourself will be making "the web a better place" and joining us in doing so.
You go on to say:
"I mean sure it may not me the easiest to hear, but have I told any lies?"
You certainly have not told any lies but you may have made "unsubstantiated statements". Please please report any apparent wrong doing through the official channels and if they are substantiated you can be certain that it will be dealt with.
In conclusion I would like to say. I am a webmaster and an ODP editor. NONE of my sites are listed in ODP and I have absolutely no intention of listing them. This is the easiest stand point for me and then no allegations can be made at me personally or at the ODP because of me. You post " Sure maybe it's a bit hateful, but be honest towards yourself DMOZ, after years of corruption don't you deserve it?" Yes it does come across as a bit hateful so why not change that perspective and join us in making "the web a better place" by reporting an inconsistencies you see?
Posted at 8:23AM on Dec 7th 2007 by laigh